Investing Curiouscatblog

Tag: research

  • Tesco: Consistent Earnings Growth at Attractive Price

    Tesco is one of the holdings in my 12 stocks for 10 years portfolio (currently returning 450 basis point above S&P 500 annually). I agree with this well documented post – Tesco: Consistent Earnings Growth at Attractive Price

    Tesco is the largest UK retailer and the 3rd largest global retailer. Tesco controlled 30.8% of the UK grocery market as of May 2009 and ~9% of the UK non-food retail market.
    …
    Tesco has leading market share positions in Hungary (#1), Thailand (#1), Ireland (#2), S. Korea (#2), Malaysia (#2), Slovakia (#3), Poland (#4) and Czech Republic (#4).

    The company entered China several years ago and plans to open more hypermarkets and shopping centers over the next decade. The Chinese retail market remains very fragmented and the top three players each control less than 1% market share.
    …
    Tesco generated £5 billion in operating cash flow last year, benefiting from improvement in working capital efficiency and good inventory management. Its capital expenditures were £4.7 billion last year (£2.6 billion in UK and £2.1 billion in international). The company expects its capital expenditures to decline to £3.5 billion this year through spending less on mixed use development land and purchasing fewer existing stores from UK competitors.
    …
    Tesco ended the year with £9.6 billion in net debt, up £3.4 billion from the prior year… Nevertheless, its interest coverage ratio was 8.9x last year and does not appear too aggressive.

    A big part of my reason for buying Tesco is their management teams commitment to lean thinking (Toyota Production System) management methods. I still worry they will not continue to adopt these methods more thoroughly but I believe superior management methods are one reason their performance has been good in the past and should improve even more if they continue to apply those methods more.

    Related: Jubak Looks at 5 Technology Stocks – 10 Stocks for Income Investors – Small Business Profit and Cash Flow – GM and Citigroup Replaced by Cisco and Travelers in the Dow

  • Data Shows Subprime Mortgages Were Failing Years Before the Crisis Hit

    Here is a very interesting paper showing real analysis of the data to illustrate that the deteriorating condition of loans should have been caught by those financing such loans years before the mortgage crisis erupted. Understanding the Subprime Mortgage Crisis by Yuliya Demyanyk, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and Otto Van Hemert, New York University.

    Using loan-level data, we analyze the quality of subprime mortgage loans by adjusting their performance for differences in borrower characteristics, loan characteristics, and macroeconomic conditions. We find that the quality of loans deteriorated for six consecutive years before the crisis and that securitizers were, to some extent, aware of it. We provide evidence that the rise and fall of the subprime mortgage market follows a classic lending boom-bust scenario, in which unsustainable growth leads to the collapse of the market. Problems could have been detected long before the crisis, but they were masked by high house price appreciation between 2003 and 2005.
    …
    In many respects, the subprime market experienced a classic lending boom-bust scenario with rapid market growth, loosening underwriting standards, deteriorating loan performance, and decreasing risk premiums.30 Argentina in 1980, Chile in 1982, Sweden, Norway, and Finland in 1992, Mexico in 1994, Thailand, Indonesia, and Korea in 1997 all experienced the culmination of a boom-bust scenario, albeit in different economic settings.
    Were problems in the subprime mortgage market apparent before the actual crisis erupted in 2007? Our answer is yes, at least by the end of 2005. Using the data available only at the end of 2005, we show that the monotonic degradation of the subprime market was already apparent. Loan quality had been worsening for five years in a row at that point. Rapid appreciation in housing prices masked the deterioration in the subprime mortgage market and thus the true riskiness of subprime mortgage loans. When housing prices stopped climbing, the risk in the market became apparent.

    Related: Nearly 10% of Mortgages Delinquent or in Foreclosure – How Much Worse Can the Mortgage Crisis Get? – Homes Entering Foreclosure at Record – Articles on Real Estate