Leasing or Purchasing a Solar Energy System For Your House

The economics of solar energy make sense today. The main stumbling block is financing the initial purchase (for homeowners, businesses or utilities). For new power generation solar is economically competitive in many locations today and prices continue to decline. One aspect that has harmed financing is the historical depreciation has been high (assuming a short lifespan of solar panels) but the panels now have much longer lifespans, meaning that when computing the return of solar investments you can expect a longer payback period. Combine that with falling prices and the economic case is great.

For a homeowner there is still the problem of financing what could be a $30,000 installation. Of course, the extremely low interest rates help here. First you have low cost capital (when calculating your return). Second, your alternative yields are very low (so it isn’t like you would earn 8% on your money just buying a CD). But for those that don’t want to take on the loan many companies are being formed to work on the financing for you (they deal with financing and then sell you the electricity they generate with panels on your home). It is a good business model I think. I personally think you are better off cutting out the intermediary and financing it yourself, but if you don’t want to, you can get cheaper electricity and help the environment.

In the USA there is a 30% federal tax credit for solar installation. Several states also offer tax credits for solar installation. There are also incentives in many other countries including Japan, Germany, Spain, Italy…

Where the U.S. Solar Industry Is Shining

The residential market for solar is still nascent, with less than 0.1 percent of U.S. homes outfitted with panels. That number could climb to 2.4 percent by 2020, estimates Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Prices for solar cells fell 51 percent in 2011, to 88¢ a watt, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Developers in the U.S. added 449.2 megawatts of solar-generating capacity in the third quarter of 2011, the latest data available, up 140 percent from the same quarter a year earlier.

SunRun hires local companies in 10 states to install solar arrays on customers’ roofs. The company charges clients for the electricity they generate— at monthly rates as much as 15 percent below those of regular utilities. Jurich says she expects SunRun to have a presence in 15 to 20 states within five years.

I own JinkoSolar stock which manufactures solar panels. This is based on the belief that solar has reached a point where it is a good way to generate electricity and we have huge needs for electrical power generation world wide.

Related: Top Countries For Renewable Energy CapacityGlobal Wind Energy Capacity Exceeds 2.5% of Global Electricity NeedsSolar Energy: Economics, Government and TechnologyOil Consumption by Country 1990-2009


Solar is not so cheap today that is makes economic sense to turn off current generating capacity (where the capital has already been invested in some greenhouse gas producing facility). However for new capacity in many locations it makes sense today. And new capacity is needed. Battery technology is not good enough today for a completely solar and wind electrical generation system to make sense. Storage of generated electricity is the biggest stumbling block now to even more compelling case for solar and wind. Storage will be addressed with engineering innovation, most likely. Solar and wind electrical generation should increase dramatically in the next 5, 10 and 20 years.

The credits provided currently are not even needed to make the financial decision to invest in solar a wise decision: the dramatic technical improvements and cost reductions are the key reasons investing in solar energy makes sense today. The other thing the credits do is make financing more readily available (which really is mainly an issue due to lifespan estimates for solar power generation being far to low in the calculations – according to recent studies). The credit just make it even wiser to do so.

Solar power much cheaper to produce than most analysts realize, study finds

However, Dr. Pearce notes that studies currently out there are simply ignoring the 70 percent reduction in the cost of solar panels since 2009. Another key point Pearce and his team brought up is that the lifetime of a solar installation is far longer than 20 years (what has been used in previous LCOE analyses). Pearce says, “we should be doing our economic analysis at least on a 30-year lifetime.”

Additionally, Dr. Pearce says that research now shows that the productivity of top-of-the-line solar panels only drops between 0.1 and 0.2 percent annually, rather than the much higher 1 percent drop used in many cost analyses.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *