Investing Curiouscatblog

Category: Retirement

  • Add to Your Roth IRA

    If you haven’t added money to your Roth Individual Retirement Account for this year yet – go ahead and do so now. Given the state of retirement planning for the vast majority of those in the USA there is a good chance your retirement is the area of your financial life that will most benefit from more resources. The other action that is likely worthwhile is to cut your spending but we will leave that for other posts.

    If your employer offers matching on your 401(k) or 403(b) that may well be an even higher priority. There is almost never a decent reason not to add at least 5% of your income to a retirement account matched by your employer. Make sure, as the amount grows above $100,000 that it is invested in a diversified manor (not all in the stock of your employer or…).

    For 2007 the most you can add to your Roth IRA or just IRA is $4,000 ($5,000 for those 50 years old or older). Next year that maximum increases to $5,000 ($6,000 for those 50 and up). If you have already added the maximum that is matched to your 401k and have added the maximum to your IRA for this year get ready to add the $5,000 to your IRA for 2008 in January (you do have to make sure you don’t earn too much to be eligible to add funds – pretty much you have to be over $100,000 in income, $150,000 on a joint return, before you have to worry but look up the details yourself). By adding the money to your IRA early in the year you will get another year or tax free growth (for the Roth or tax deferred growth from the regular IRA).

    For more details on the rules on IRAs see the links we provide on the Curious Cat Investment Dictionary IRA page.

    Related: Saving for Retirement – Roth IRAs a Smart bet for Younger Set – Our Only Hope: Retiring Later

  • Tips To Allow Retiring Sooner

    The Motely Fool is one of the best web sites for learning about investing (it is one of the sites included in our investing links – on the left column of this page). A recent article on the site is worth reading – Ways to Retire Sooner:

    Add cash… It takes a little more than $550 per month in savings earning a 7% return to get to $1 million over the course of a 35-year career. But if you can add just $100 per month to that — including what your employer puts in and your tax savings — you can cut more than two years off your wait.
    Embrace stocks Saving more is great, but there’s only so much you’ll be able to put aside. You have to make the most of what you have. People are often too conservative in their retirement investments. Despite the sometimes-violent ups and downs of the stock market, the long-term return on stocks far exceeds that of less risky investments like bonds and bank savings accounts.

    These are not exactly earth shattering recommendation but so many people fail to take even the most basic steps to assure a economically viable retirement the simple advice needs to be re-enforced. No one piece of advice can assure success but by educating yourself about investing and retirement planning and taking steps when you are in your 20s, 30s and 40s you can succeed. You can also succeed without doing anything in your 20s it just means you have to do more work later. Those that get started earlier get a huge advantage.

    Related: Saving for Retirement – Retirement Tips from TIAA CREF – Retiring Later, Out of Necessity – investment risks – IRA (Individual Retirement Accounts)

  • Old and Wealthy

    I am not exactly sure why but for some reason people seem very ignorant of the wealth distribution by age. The richest group by far are those over 65. There are several reasons for this including self preservation. Once you stop working you better have a large pool of capital or you will most likely have little income (you could have a great pension and no other savings but…). Another is that the “miracle” of compound interest. Those that actually saved enough for retirement often find their investments out-earning their spending thus wealth increasing yearly. This effect over time results in wealth increasing dramatically. Many of those that failed to save enough will have their savings dissolve very quickly thus leaving the inverse of a bell curve (a high number of wealthy and of poor and a lessor number in the middle). Social Security helps those that failed to save enough for retirement to slow the decline (and those that saved enough to become even wealthier even faster). The presence of large numbers of poor elderly I think is one reason so many are surprised that they are the richest age group.

    I used to be surprised how few people know this – now I know, for those I talk to anyway, they are always surprised. This has several public policy impacts such as why do we have a huge “social security transfer system” (social security including medicare) to move money from the young to the old when the old are wealthier than the young? People see the 7.65% deducted from their check but the employer has to pay an equal amount to this transfer of wealth between the generations bringing the total to 15.3%.

    It doesn’t make much sense to me to have those working at Wal-mart and McDonalds transfer 15.3% of the income from their labor to much wealthier people. Yes, paying something in I think is fair. But the system should be adjusted. One method I would use is to reduce (or eliminate) payments to the wealthy elderly (continuing the existing payments to the poor elderly is affordable so I see continuing those payments as good public policy) and reduce taxes on the working poor. Obviously others disagree so we transfer a large amount of money from those working at Wal-mart to those with hundreds of thousands in investments. I think this is wrong. I wish at least the facts would be known so that the decision is made with awareness of the facts.

    The median net worth of people 55 to 64 has climbed to nearly $250,000, while it has dropped to about $50,000 for those in their late 30s
    …
    The growing divide between the rich and poor in America is more generation gap than class conflict, according to a USA TODAY analysis of federal government data. The rich are getting richer, but what’s received little attention is who these rich people are. Overwhelmingly, they’re older folks. Nearly all additional wealth created in the USA since 1989 has gone to people 55 and older, according to Federal Reserve data. Wealth has doubled since 1989 in households headed by older Americans.
    …
    The implications are far-reaching and can turn conventional wisdom on its head. Social Security and Medicare increasingly are functioning as a transfer of money from less affluent young people to much wealthier older people.

    Wow, I don’t recall seeing publications actually point out this fact very often. Good for the USA Today.
    (more…)

  • How Much Retirement Income?

    Current vs. retirement income: How much do I need?:

    some people say you need 70 percent of pre-retirement income after retiring, while others claim it’s 80 percent, 85 percent or 90 percent. But whatever version of this rule you hear, I think you need to take it with a very large block of salt. Of course, that’s true of all rules of thumb, whether it’s the percentage of pre-retirement income you need, “the 4 percent rule” on withdrawing funds from your portfolio in retirement, the “save 10 percent for retirement rule” or any other benchmark.

    After all, rules of thumb are shortcuts; they’re solutions that are supposed to work for the “average” person.

    Good advice. The rules of thumb can help you get an idea of the ballpark for a fictional “average” person in general. But your particular situation is different.

  • Retirement Savings Survey Results

    Have less than $25K in savings? Get in line

    Nearly half of all workers saving for retirement have savings that fall short of the $25,000 mark, according to the 2007 Retirement Confidence Survey by the Employee Benefit Research Institute and Matthew Greenwald & Associates. Predictably, the youngest workers (ages 25-34) dominate this group – 68 percent of them have less than $25,000 earmarked for their later years. But so do half of workers age 35 to 44 and a third of workers age 45 to 55 and over.

    What is a very rough estimate of what you need? Well obviously factors like a pension, social security payments, age at retirement, home ownership, health insurance, marital status… make a huge difference in the total amount needed. But something in the neighborhood of 10-25 times your desired retirement income is in the ballpark of what most experts recommend. So if you want $50,000 in income you need $500,000 – $1,250,000. Obviously that is difficult to save over a short period of time. The key to retirement saving is consistent, long term commitment to saving.

    Related: Saving for Retirement – Start Young with 401k and Roth IRA – Retirement Delayed: Working Longer

  • Boomers Face Retirement

    Boomers on brink of retirement wonder if they can afford it:

    Scholz was among a small group of economists cited in a recent front page story in the New York Times who said – to the shock of many – that the financial industry overstates how much money people will need in retirement.
    …
    Scholz doesn’t go that far, but he does question the popular notion that most baby boomers are “blowing it” in their preparation for retirement. He says the group’s research showed that, by and large, Americans born between 1931 and 1941 were faring quite well financially during their retirement. “That was very surprising to us,” he says. “So then an interesting question is, does the experience of that generation carry over to households that are younger?”
    …
    “They’re like, ‘Well, I finally got a cell phone.’ They use a computer but it’s one that’s eight years old. Their cars run forever.” That mindset is far different from most baby boomers, Haunty argues. To them, items once viewed as luxuries are now considered necessities. And, he adds, this “propensity to consume” is even more prevalent among Americans in their 20s and 30s. Haunty says he’s not advocating that baby boomers “save every penny and wear the same jeans they wore 10 years ago. But they’ve got to strike a balance.”

    Well said. If you have enough money to afford whatever you want and can maintain an emergency fund, buy disability insurance, buy health insurance, save for retirement, avoid personal debt, save for children’s education… great. If not, then choices need to be made about what is most important and then you get to live with the consequences of those choice.

  • Roth IRAs a Smart bet for Younger Set

    There are few investment opportunities as valuable as IRAs (tax sheltered retirement accounts) – nor many more critical to successful personal financial success (for younger or older really). Roth IRAs a smart bet for younger set by Tami Luhby.

    Roth IRAs, as well as the newer Roth 401(k)s, are a smart bet for many people in their 20s and 30s, experts say. Younger workers are more likely to be in a lower tax bracket now than when they retire, making any current tax deductions less valuable, and they have enough years to save to make the tax-free withdrawals very beneficial.

    The beauty of the Roth IRA and 401(k) is that there’s no tax on the capital gains in the accounts, so the longer you have to accumulate those gains, the better.

    Mathematically, if the tax rate in the year of the contribution and the tax rate at the year of withdrawal are equal a Roth IRA and regular IRA provide the same value. However, in addition to earning less money in while young and therefor being in a lower tax bracket there is also the benefit from a Roth IRA of eliminating the risk of an increasing tax rate structure. Since money withdrawn from a Roth IRA is not taxable. This is a huge benefit.

    So add to your IRA for last year if you have not already and add to your IRA for this year now. Also add to any employer matched 401(k) for your long term retirement savings. Few investments will have the long term impact of adding to retirement accounts early and often.

    Related: Saving for Retirement

  • Social Security Trust Fund

    The Washington Post really doesn’t like Social Security … by Brad Setser

    Best I can tell, Social Security is in the best financial shape of any federal program. It is in far better future shape than Medicare. And it is in way better shape than the portion of the government that isn’t financed by the payroll tax. That part of the government has a $434 billion deficit. Social Security, by contrast, has a $185b cash flow surplus. Social Security’s revenues exceed its expenditures – and will continue to do so for several years. Its financial assets are growing – they will top $2 trillion at the end of this year.

    This is not the way the story is normally told. Social Security is actually in good shape for at least 30 years. That doesn’t mean it is not a big problem after that but Brad Setser makes a good point that the huge increase in the rest of the debt has really made that problem seem minor. The main point? We need to fix the rest of the budget mess, and while I still think Social Security needs adjustment really that is not as important as fixing the rest of the spending money the government doesn’t have.

    Related: Estate Tax Repeal

  • Investor Protection Needed

    In an instant, retirement savings vanish by Bob Sullivan:

    With hacking of brokerage accounts increasing, the legal gap facing DeSmidt and other victims has regulators and critics debating the need for new consumer protections.
    …
    Few consumers appreciate the fact that, unlike credit card and checking account transactions, there are no federal consumer regulations specifically protecting consumers in the event of brokerage account hacking
    …
    Both credit card transactions and electronic account transfers, such as online banking payments, are governed by Federal Reserve regulations that strictly limit consumers’ losses from theft. Consumers who report credit card fraud are only liable for $50
    …
    Despite the lack of legal compulsion, some investment firms have taken to offering broad consumer protections anyway. Both e-trade and Charles Schwab offer credit-card style guarantees. Money stolen from Charles Schwab’s Web site will be returned to consumers as long as the theft is reported in a timely way, said Schwab’s Greg Gable.

    This risk is something the government should address. The risk is to the economy at large, as well as having extreme consequences for individual investors. We need to do as much as possible to encourage retirement savings. Not providing government backing (such as provided by FDIC…) is a mistake. The funding should be similar to that for FDIC where member banks are assessed fees to cover the costs of the program based on the risks seen in that institution.

    FDIC has done a great job of creating an environment that gives individuals confidence in the system and encourages economic development. Securities Investor Protection Corporation is another possible model but for something so important to the economic security of the country (and individuals lives) direct government involvement makes sense to me.

  • Encourage Your Kids to Start Saving Early

    How to make your kids millionaires by Walter Updegrave:

    Many younger workers don’t sign up for their 401(k) because the process feels too overwhelming. The last thing you want to do is add to the confusion by launching into a long lecture on asset allocation. A better tack, says Brigitte Madrian, a Harvard economist who studies the behavior of 401(k) participants, “is to break up the process into smaller pieces.”

    Your first goal: Encourage them to contribute enough to get the employer match, without worrying about sorting through all the investment options. Just have them stick the money in a target retirement fund (or if that’s not an option, a stock-index fund).

    You can talk to them later about boosting their contribution and fine-tuning their strategy.

    Related: Saving for Retirement – Start Young with 401k and Roth IRA – what is a 401k? – articles on investing for retirement