Investing Curiouscatblog

Category: Personal finance

  • Federal Reserve to Buy $1.2T in Bonds, Mortgage-Backed Securities

    I make a point of showing the discount rate changes by the Fed don’t translate to mortgage rate changes. I do so because many people think the discount rate does directly effect mortgage rates. But the Fed announced today, actions that actually do impact mortgage rates.

    Federal Reserve to Buy $1.2T in Bonds, Mortgage-Backed Securities

    The central bank will increase its purchases of mortgage-backed securities by $750 billion, on top of a previously announced $500 billion. It also will double its purchases of debt in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to $200 billion. Those steps are intended to lower mortgage rates. The announcement of the previous purchases pushed mortgage rates down a full percentage point.

    If you are looking at refinancing your mortgage now (or soon) might be a good time, rates were already very low and will be declining. And if you own long term bonds you just got a nice increase in your value (bond prices move up when interest rates move down).

    Related: Lowest 30 Year Fixed Mortgage Rates in 37 Years – Low Mortgage Rates Not Available to Everyone – Why do we Have a Federal Reserve Board?

  • 12 Stocks for 10 Years – March 2009 Update

    I originally setup the 10 stocks for 10 years portfolio in April of 2005. The stock market has declined quite a bit since that time. Four of the 12 stocks currently have positive returns and 8 have losses (the market is down 8% annually). I still feel very happy with the makeup of this portfolio overall. The current stocks, in order of return:

    Stock Current Return % of sleep well portfolio now % of the portfolio if I were buying today
    Amazon – AMZN 91% 10% 8%
    Google – GOOG 49% 15% 12%
    Templeton Dragon Fund – TDF 40% 10% 10%
    PetroChina – PTR 11% 10% 10%
    Cisco – CSCO -17% 6% 8%
    Toyota – TM -21% 9% 11%
    Templeton Emerging Market Fund – EMF -25% 4% 5%
    Danaher – DHR -28% 6% 9%
    Intel – INTC -35% 5% 7%
    Tesco – TSCDY -38% 0% 10%
    Pfizer – PFE -45% 6% 6%
    Dell -73% 4% 4%

    At this point I am most positive on Google, Toyota and Templeton Dragon Fund. I am still wary of Dell; it has fallen 73%. I have not sold any Dell, still the percentage of the actual portfolio invested in Dell has dropped to 4%, I have also reduced the amount I would invest now to 4% (and I am leaning to selling it). I am satisfied with Pfizer, at this price and yield. (and also like having some exposure to health care).

    In order to track performance I setup a marketocracy portfolio but had to make some minor adjustments. The current marketocracy calculated annualized rate or return (which excludes Tesco) is -4.2% (the S&P 500 annualized return for the period is -8.3%) – marketocracy subtracts the equivalent of 2% of assets annually to simulate management fees – as though the portfolio were a mutual fund – so without that the return is about -2.2%). The portfolio is beating the S&P 500 by 4.1% annually (which is actually quite good, though still that means just losing less than the S&P 500. Also it is a bit confused due to to Tesco not being included. View the current marketocracy Sleep Well portfolio page.

    Related: 12 Stocks for 10 Years Update – June 2008 – 12 Stocks for 10 Years Update (Feb 2008) – posts on stocks – investing books
    (more…)

  • Changing Shopping Habits

    I think this article stretches pretty far to try and find a silver lining but these days it is hard to find anything positive: A silver lining to the economic crisis? by James Melik

    “People are now understanding they are going to have to depend on each other – employees are deciding to take a day off work without pay, or even a pay cut, to avoid their colleagues losing their jobs – that’s kind of a new phenomenon,” says Mr Wallis. He believes there is a growing sense of community.

    “People are trying to understand that we are all in this together, not just in an idealistic, altruistic way, but in a practical way,” he says. He is also concerned about how future generations will look after the environment. “We are stewards of fragile resources,” he says.

    “That conversion to a green economy is more than structural, it is also spiritual and that is the chance this crisis offers us,” he says.

    We certainly do need people to be more financially responsible in their spending habits. Poor spending habits have been a problem for quite some time, the poor economy just is now focusing more people on those bad habits.

    Related: Trying to Keep up with the Jones – Can I Afford That? – Too Much Stuff – Americans are Drowning in Debt

  • House of Cards – Mortgage Crisis Documentary

    A documentary of the mortgage crisis by CNBC: House of Cards. It is a bit slow and simple but still for people that don’t really understand the basics of what happened it is interesting.

    Related: Nearly 10% of Mortgages Delinquent or in Foreclosure – Ignorance of Many Mortgage Holders (2007) – How Not to Convert Equity – mortgage terms

  • When Will the Recession Be Over?

    6 months ago I figured we could hope than in late 2009 we would see the beginning of the recovery. I am much less optimistic about the later half of 2009 now. The initial reports for the last quarter of 2008 showed GDP Down 3.8%, the worst since 1982. That has now been updated to an annualized decline of 6.2%. Still the economy actually grew for all of 2008 by just over 1%, something I don’t think most people realize.

    The New York Times has published the thoughts of several economists on When the Recession Will End, from the always true to the “dismal science” name, Jame Grant, “the end is unknown.” A. Michael Spence, 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics, “The short answer is not soon“:

    The recession is global: exports, production and consumption are in high-speed descent. The headwinds are powerful because of excessive leverage, damaged balance sheets and the resulting tight credit.
    …
    Governments and central banks are the only major sources of credit, liquidity and incremental demand — private capital and sovereign wealth funds, having experienced losses, are largely sidelined. If governments are quick and clear in their intentions and intervene in a coordinated way in both the real economy and the financial sector, we will probably have an unusually long and deep global recession through 2010. If they don’t, it is likely to be worse than that.

    Nouriel Roubini, this recession may last 36 months:

    Today, as we enter the 15th month, it’s obvious that we are already in a painful U-shaped recession that has become global and will last at least until the end of the year — 24 months, the longest since the Great Depression. Even if the gross domestic product grows in 2010, it is likely to be no higher than 1 percent. And at that rate, with the unemployment rate rising toward 10 percent, we will still be substantially in a recession.

    And from the Google CEO

    But when looking at our economic decline, we can all agree on two things: we did not get here overnight and we will not recover tomorrow.
    …
    By the end of the year, we may see some growth, with gains in employment to follow a few months later.

    I am much less confident that by the end of 2009 we will be in a recovery. That is still very possible, but I am much more worried we will not be. Frankly if we keep the decline in the 2009 GDP to under 2% I think that will be a success. And if the 2010 GDP declines less than 1% or increases I think we should be happy. Another key is how high the unemployment rate goes. It is almost certain to go significantly higher. If 2010 sees a return to the decent or good job growth that will be a huge success. But job growth the last 8 years has been horrible (500,000 more jobs lost).

    Related: Uncertain Economic Times (March 2008) – The Economy is in Serious Trouble – What Should You Do With Your Government “Stimulus” Check? – Economic Fault: Income Inequality

  • Low Mortgage Rates But High Eligibility Requirements

    Low Mortgage Rates a Mirage as Fees Climb, Eligibility Tightens

    The average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage dropped to 5.07 percent for the week ending Feb. 26 from 6.63 percent for the one ending July 24
    …
    “A score of 700 was once near perfect,” said Gwen Muse Evans, vice president of credit policy at Fannie Mae, the government-controlled company that helps set lending standards. “Today, a 700 performs more like a 660 did. We have updated our policy to take into account the drift in credit scores.”

    Consumer credit scores, called FICOs after creator Fair Isaac Corp., range from 300 to 850. The average FICO score on mortgages bought by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae rose to 747.5 in the fourth quarter of last year from 722.3 in 2005, according to Inside Mortgage Finance.

    Accunet’s Wickert said that a 660 FICO score would have qualified most borrowers for loans with no upfront fees in the past. Now, someone trying to borrow $200,000 with a 660 score would have to pay a 2.8 percent fee, or $5,600, he said. Even someone with a 719 score would have to pay $1,750 in cash.

    The low mortgage rates are attractive but a decision to re-finance (or buy) must consider the long term implications. Also if you are re-financing to take advantage of the low rates consider a 20 year or 15 year loan if you are already well into your 30 year loan. A fixed rate loan is the most sensible option at this time.

    Related: Low Mortgage Rates Not Available to Everyone – 30 Year Fixed Mortgage Rates and the Fed Funds Rate Chart – Ignorance of Many Mortgage Holders – Fed Plans To Curb Mortgage Excesses – How Not to Convert Home Equity

  • Warren Buffet Webcast to MBAs

    Warren Buffett is really someone worth listening to. This is a short talk he gave to MBA students and then he answers questions for over an hour. I think he is speaking at the University of Florida in 1998.

    Here is a great quote to remember as you invest (from part 2): “To make money they didn’t have and didn’t need, they risked what they did have and did need. And that’s foolish.” That goes for anyone I think. He was talking about the geniuses behind Long Term Capital Management (and the collapse about a decade ago – for those of you that think finance people risking serious harm to the economy for their personal gain is something new, it isn’t). You can read a good book about Long Term Capital Management’s fail: When Genius Failed.

    Related: Warren Buffett’s Annual Report – Great Advice from Warren Buffett – Misuse of Statistics, Mania in Financial Markets – Investing Books
    (more…)

  • More Companies Cutting Dividends Than Any Year Since Before 1954

    Dividends Falling Means S&P 500 Is Still Expensive

    U.S. equities returned 6 percent a year on average since 1900, inflation-adjusted data compiled by the London Business School and Credit Suisse Group AG show. Take away dividends and the annual gain drops to 1.7 percent, compared with 2.1 percent for long-term Treasury bonds, according to the data.

    A total of 288 companies cut or suspended payouts last quarter, the most since Standard & Poor’s records began 54 years ago, when Dwight D. Eisenhower was president. While the S&P 500 is trading at the lowest price relative to earnings since 1985 and all 10 Wall Street strategists tracked by Bloomberg forecast a rally this year, predictions based on dividends show shares are overvalued by as much as 46 percent.

    Just last November the S&P 500 dividend yield topped the bond yield for the first time since 1958. Yields often rise as stock prices fall on future prospects and companies announce dividend cuts after stocks have already fallen (due to the deteriorating conditions the company faces). So you always must be careful not to count dividends before they are paid. As an investor you need to look into the future and see how secure the dividends are likely to be.

    Related: 10 Stocks for Income Investors – 10 Stocks for 10 Years – Curious Cat Investing Books

  • Jumbo Loan Defaults Rise at Fast Pace

    Jumbo Loan Defaults Rise at Fast Pace as Rich Suffer

    About 2.57 percent of prime borrowers who took out jumbo loans last year were at least 60 days delinquent

    2.57% of homeowners with jumbo mortgage are 60 days late, of those that just got loan last year! That is crazy. These kinds of figures are astounding to me. I am still (posted Feb 2007) amazed that 4.4% is the historic low for mortgages over a month late.

    About 1.92 percent of homeowners with 2008 mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fell at least 60 days behind, LPS Applied Analytics said. Jumbo loans are bigger than what the two government-controlled agencies buy or guarantee, and Obama’s plan focuses on shoring up mortgages eligible to be bought by Fannie and Freddie.
    …
    The top five U.S. jumbo lenders — Chase Home Finance LLC, Bank of America Corp., Washington Mutual Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Citigroup Inc. — originated a combined $55.3 billion in jumbos in 2008. They lent just $4.3 billion of that during the last three months of the year, according to Inside Mortgage Finance.
    …
    The national average for a 30-year fixed-rate jumbo mortgage was 6.57 percent this week compared with 5.34 percent for a conforming loan, according to White Plains, New York-based financial data provider BanxQuote.

    Related: The Impact of Credit Scores and Jumbo Size on Mortgage Rates – Low Mortgage Rates Not Available to Everyone – 30 Year Fixed Mortgage Rates and the Fed Funds Rate – posts about mortgages

  • Credit Card Charge-offs Increase to Over 7% of Accounts

    Punctual Payers Face Higher Rates From Card Companies

    His reward for paying on time was an interest rate increase to 19 percent from 12 percent.
    …
    The average interest rate charged on credit-card balances decreased to 13.4 percent in November from 14.4 percent a year earlier, according to the Federal Reserve’s December G19 report, which tracks rates for credit-card accounts. The prime rate has decreased to 3.25 percent from 6 percent last February. Most variable credit-card rates are linked to the prime rate, which follows the federal funds rate.

    Rate changes announced by New York-based Citigroup Inc., the biggest U.S. credit-card issuer, American Express Co. and Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America Corp. are intended to raise revenue, said Woolsey, who is based in Austin, Texas.

    Citigroup’s charge-off rates of loans increased by 88 percent, climbing to 7.81 percent in December from 4.16 percent a year earlier, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Charge- offs are loans the banks don’t expect to be repaid. American Express’s charge-off rates more than doubled to 7.23 percent from 3.32 percent while Bank of America’s rates increased to 8.45 percent from 5.24 percent, a 61 percent jump.

    You can avoid worries about credit card companies increase your interest rates by taking sensible financial precautions and avoiding credit card debt.

    Related: posts on credit cards – Don’t Let the Credit Card Companies Play You for a Fool – Legislation to Address the Worst Credit Card Fee Abuse – Incredibly Bad Customer Service from Discover Card