Investing Curiouscatblog

Tag: Investing

  • Lazy Portfolios Seven-year Winning Streak

    Here is an excellent article on how to invest in the stock market. I personally tweak this advice a bit but it is much better than most advice you get. Basically keep costs down (don’t pay large fees) and diversify. Lazy Portfolios seven-year winning streak by Paul Farrell

    Greed drives this [mutual fund] industry. The “world’s largest skimming operation” has now lost over 50% of America’s savings in the decade since the peak of 2000. The track record of actively managed funds during the recent subprime-credit meltdown continues to prove that the industry is failing America. The only way to invest is with index funds, which make up just 14% of the total.
    …
    In short, even though we know that the average compensation of portfolio managers is often $400,000 to more than a $1 million, the hot-shot managers of these actively managed funds provided no value-added to their funds’ performance. Conclusion: Their investors would be better off investing in index funds.
    …
    Yes, the market was in negative territory the past few years, but still all eight Lazy Portfolios outperformed each of the six actively-managed funds.
    …
    Customize your own Lazy Portfolio following these six rules and you’ll win. More important, you’ll have lots of time left to enjoy what really counts, your family, friends, career, sports, hobbies, living.
    …
    2) Frugality, savings versus financial obesity. Tools like starting early, autopilot saving plans, dollar-cost averaging, frugal living and other tricks are familiar to long-term investors. Trust your frugality instincts — living below your means — it’s a trait common among America’s “millionaires next door.”

    Related: Lazy Portfolio Results (April 2008) – Allocations Make A Big Difference – 12 stocks for 10 years – 401(k)s are a Great Way to Save for Retirement

  • Retirement Planning – How Secure Are You?

    Wells Fargo is offering to donate $1 to Kiva for every person that completes a 7 question survey (no contact information is required) to get what they call a retirement security index. I did and there are 2 benefits to doing so yourself. First, most of us would benefit from more attention to our retirement planning. Second help out Kiva – which I have mentioned many time.

    Now I think their questionnaire is far too simplistic but it is hard to get people to spend even 15 minutes looking at a saving plan for retirement. So I know they are trying to keep it very simple so people will complete it. That said, read our posts on retirement planning to lean more about planning for retirement. It is critical that you spend the time in your 20’s, 30’s and 40’s doing this or you are really going to have trouble making decent retirement plans.

    Related: Add to Your 401(k) and IRA – Spending Guidelines in Retirement – Retirement Savings Survey Results – Personal Finance: Saving for Retirement

  • SEC Curtails Abusive Short Sales

    Short selling stock is a tool that can help keep markets more stable. However, short selling can be used to manipulate the market and in the last decade naked short selling has contributed to such manipulation. The SEC has made permanent a temporary rule that was approved in 2008 in response to continuing concerns regarding “fails to deliver” and potentially abusive “naked” short selling. In particular, temporary Rule 204T made it a violation of Regulation SHO and imposes penalties if a clearing firm:

    * does not purchase or borrow shares to close-out a “fail to deliver”
    * resulting from a short sale in any equity security
    * by no later than the beginning of trading on the day after the fail first occurs (Trade + 4 days).

    Cutting Down Failures to Deliver: An analysis conducted by the SEC’s Office of Economic Analysis, which followed the adoption of the close-out requirement of Rule 204T and the elimination of the “options market maker” exception, showed the number of “fails” declined significantly.

    For example, since the fall of 2008, fails to deliver in all equity securities has decreased by approximately 57 percent and the average daily number of threshold list securities has declined from a high of approximately 582 securities in July 2008 to 63 in March 2009. Which still is not acceptable, in my opinion. In general this is a good move by the SEC, but still not sufficient.

    Transparency is increased some by the SEC with the new rules:

    * Daily Publication of Short Sale Volume Information. It is expected in the next few weeks that the SROs will begin publishing on their Web sites the aggregate short selling volume in each individual equity security for that day.
    * Disclosure of Short Sale Transaction Information. It is expected in the next few weeks that the SROs will begin publishing on their Web sites on a one-month delayed basis information regarding individual short sale transactions in all exchange-listed equity securities.
    * Twice Monthly Disclosure of Fails Data. It is expected in the next few weeks that the Commission will enhance the publication on its Web site of fails to deliver data so that fails to deliver information is provided twice per month and for all equity securities, regardless of the fails level.

    Full SEC press release: SEC Takes Steps to Curtail Abusive Short Sales and Increase Market Transparency

    Related: SEC Temporarily Bans Short-selling Financial Stocks – Shorting Using Inverse Funds – Too Much Leverage Killed Mervyns

  • 12 Stocks for 10 Years – July 2009 Update

    I originally setup the 10 stocks for 10 years portfolio in April of 2005. In order to track performance created a marketocracy portfolio but had to make some minor adjustments (and marketocracy doesn’t allow Tesco to be purchased, though it is easily available as an ADR to anyone in the USA to buy in real life – it is based in England). The current marketocracy calculated annualized rate or return (which excludes Tesco) is 3.5% (the S&P 500 annualized return for the period is -1.7%) – marketocracy subtracts the equivalent of 2% of assets annually to simulate management fees – as though the portfolio were a mutual fund – so without that the return is about 5.5%).

    The current stocks, in order of return:

    Stock Current Return % of sleep well portfolio now % of the portfolio if I were buying today
    Amazon – AMZN 136% 9% 9%
    Google – GOOG 105% 15% 13%
    Templeton Dragon Fund – TDF 80% 11% 11%
    PetroChina – PTR 78% 11% 10%
    Templeton Emerging Market Fund – EMF 28% 5% 6%
    Cisco – CSCO 15% 6% 8%
    Toyota – TM 7% 9% 11%
    Danaher – DHR -14% 6% 9%
    Tesco – TSCDY -14%* 0%* 10%
    Intel – INTC -15% 4% 6%
    Pfizer – PFE -38% 5% 7%
    Dell -60% 4% 0%

    The portfolio is beating the S&P 500 by 5.2% annually (which is actually quite good. Also it is a bit confused due to to Tesco not being included. View the current marketocracy Sleep Well portfolio page.

    Related: 12 Stocks for 10 Years Update – June 2008 – posts on stocks – investing books
    (more…)

  • Mobius Says Derivatives, Stimulus to Spark New Crisis

    Mobius Says Derivatives, Stimulus to Spark New Crisis

    A new financial crisis will develop from the failure to effectively regulate derivatives and the extra global liquidity from stimulus spending, Templeton Asset Management Ltd.’s Mark Mobius said.

    “Political pressure from investment banks and all the people that make money in derivatives” will prevent adequate regulation, said Mobius, who oversees $25 billion as executive chairman of Templeton in Singapore. “Definitely we’re going to have another crisis coming down,”
    …
    A “very bad” crisis may emerge within five to seven years as stimulus money adds to financial volatility, Mobius said. Governments have pledged about $2 trillion in stimulus spending.
    …
    “Banks have lobbied hard against any changes that would make them unable to take the kind of risks they took some time ago,” said Venkatraman Anantha-Nageswaran, global chief investment officer at Bank Julius Baer & Co. in Singapore. “Regulators are not winning the battle yet and I’m not sure if they are making a strong case yet for such changes.”

    Mobius also predicted a number of short, “dramatic” corrections in stock markets in the short term, saying that “a 15 to 20 percent correction is nothing when people are nervous.” Emerging-market stocks “aren’t expensive” and will continue to climb

    I share this concern for those we bailed out using the money we paid them to pay politicians for more favors. Those paying our politicians like very much paying themselves extremely well and then being bailed out by the taxpayers when their business fails. They are going to try to retain the system they have in place. And they are likely to win – politicians are more likely to provide favors to those giving them large amounts of money than they are to learn about proper management of an economy.

    Related: Congress Eases Bank Laws for Big Donors (1999) – Lobbyists Keep Tax Off Billion Dollar Private Equities Deals and On For Our Grandchildren – General Air Travel Taxes Subsidizing Private Plane Airports – CEOs Plundering Corporate Coffers

  • Curious Cat Investing and Economics Carnival #3

    Welcome to the Curious Cat Investing and Economics Carnival, we hope you enjoy the following posts we share here.

    • Warren Buffet On An Investment News Channel by Robin Bal – “I could see that the mere mention of a time scale like three to five years had derailed the interviewer’s thought process. Coming as she did from a world where three to five hours or at most three to five days is the standard unit of time, the idea of an investor talking in years seemed to have thrown a spanner in her works.”
    • Loan Default Rates: 1998-2009 by John Hunter – “In the 4th quarter of 2007 residential real estate default rates were 3.02% by the 4th quarter of 2008 they were 6.34% and in the 1st quarter of this year they were 7.91%”
    • Key Factors Affecting Long-Term Growth in Federal Spending by Douglas Elmendorf – “Two factors underlie the projected increase in federal spending on Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security as a share of GDP: rapid growth in health care costs and an aging population.”
    • Will the Chinese Keep Saving? by Rachel Ziemba – “Should export-oriented ‘surplus’ countries like China keep saving and keep trying to export demand, the reduction in imbalances could actually exacerbate the global economic contraction or contribute to a more sluggish recovery. “
    • Use Your Health Insurance! by David Weliver – “So if you’re worried about losing your job (and insurance) or anticipate making a life change that will leave you uninsured, get in to see a doctor while you are still covered.”
    • Where is the externality here? by Matt Nolan – “They are paid less because their marginal product is lower, and they are willing to be paid less because the benefit they receive from consuming alcohol is sufficient compensation – this is a completely internalised decision for the drinker isn’t it, so where is the social cost.”
    • Quibbles With Quants – “What the models failed to capture was that humans don’t behave in simple, predictable and uncorrelated ways. It’s impossible to overstate the importance of the way these models cope with correlation of peoples’ psychology. To sum it up: they don’t. Let me know if that’s too complex an analysis for the mathematical masters of the universe.”
    • Goldman’s Back, and Why We Should Be Worried by Robert Reich – “The decision to bail out AIG resulted in a $13 billion giveaway to Goldman because Goldman was an AIG counterparty. Indeed, Goldman executives and alumni have played crucial roles in guiding the Wall Street bailout from the start. So the fact that Goldman has reverted to its old ways in the market suggests it has every reason to believe it can revert to its old ways in politics, should its market strategies backfire once again — leaving the rest of us once again to pick up the pieces.”

  • The Formula That Killed Wall Street

    The Formula That Killed Wall Street

    For five years, Li’s formula, known as a Gaussian copula function, looked like an unambiguously positive breakthrough, a piece of financial technology that allowed hugely complex risks to be modeled with more ease and accuracy than ever before. With his brilliant spark of mathematical legerdemain, Li made it possible for traders to sell vast quantities of new securities, expanding financial markets to unimaginable levels.

    His method was adopted by everybody from bond investors and Wall Street banks to ratings agencies and regulators. And it became so deeply entrenched—and was making people so much money—that warnings about its limitations were largely ignored.

    Then the model fell apart. Cracks started appearing early on, when financial markets began behaving in ways that users of Li’s formula hadn’t expected. The cracks became full-fledged canyons in 2008—when ruptures in the financial system’s foundation swallowed up trillions of dollars and put the survival of the global banking system in serious peril.

    Very nice article on the dangers of financial markets to those that believe that math can provide all the answers. Math can help find opportunities. However markets have physical, psychological and regulatory limitations. And markets frequently experience huge panics or manias. People continue to fail to model that properly.

    Related: All Models Are Wrong But Some Are Useful – Leverage, Complex Deals and Mania – Financial Markets with Robert Shiller – Financial Market Meltdown – Failure to Regulate Financial Markets Leads to Predictable Consequences

  • Managing Retirement Investment Risks

    The Society for Actuaries has published a good resource: Managing post-retirement risks.

    Experts disagree about when annuitization is a good strategy. Disadvantages include losing control of assets, costs, and inability to leave money to one’s heirs. Annuities without inflation protection are only partial protection against living “too long.”
    …
    Many investors try to own some assets whose value may grow in times of inflation. However, this sometimes will trade inflation risk for investment risk.
    • Common stocks have outperformed inflation in the long run, but are
    poor short-term hedges. The historically higher returns from stocks
    are not guaranteed and may vary greatly during retirement years.
    …
    Retirement planning should not rely heavily on income from a bridge job. Many retirees welcome the chance to change careers and move into an area with less pay but more job satisfaction, or with fewer demands on their time and energy.

    Terminating employment before age 65 may make it difficult to find a source of affordable health insurance before Medicare is available.
    …
    Insurance for long-term care covers disabilities so severe that assistance is needed with daily activities such as bathing, dressing and eating. Some policies require a nursing home stay; others do not. The cost of long-term care insurance is much less if purchased at younger ages, well before anticipated need.

    The full document is well worth reading.

    Related: Many Retirees Face Prospect of Outliving Savings – How to Protect Your Financial Health – Financial Planning Made Easy – personal finance tips

  • Y-Combinator’s Fresh Approach to Entrepreneurship

    Four Lessons from Y-Combinator’s Fresh Approach to Innovation

    Y Combinator’s basic approach is to give promising ideas a small amount of seed capital (the average investment is less than $25,000), then house those startups for a short period of time. The startups get the capital, strategic input from the Y Combinator team (Graham and his wife), access to a robust network of potential investors, and the opportunity to learn from other Y Combinator–funded startups. In return Y Combinator gets a slice of the business.
    …
    Tight windows enable “good enough” design. Most Y Combinator–funded companies are expected to release a version of their idea in less than 3 months. That tight time frame forces entrepreneurs to introduce “good enough” software packages that can then iterate in market. This approach contrasts to efforts by many companies to endlessly perfect ideas in a laboratory, only to fail the real test of being exposed to real market conditions.
    Business plans are nice, not necessary. Y Combinator doesn’t obsess over whether entrepreneurs have detailed business plans. Again, the focus is getting something out in the market to drive iteration and learning. After all, if you are trying to create a market, most of the material in a business plan is assumption-based anyway.
    …

    Y-combinator is very interesting. I have posted about them several times: Find Joy and Success in Business, Build Your Business Slowly and Without Huge Cash Requirements. Investors can learn a great deal about how to grow businesses from their model. Brains, effort, customer focus, the ability to learn and business savvy can do huge things with little cash in information technology. The opportunities are available today. Y-combinator’s support of the businesses with knowledgeable resources and education (startup school) are far more important than the money they provide.

    Related: Small Business Profit and Cash Flow – Innovation Strategy – Some Good IT Business Ideas – Google and Paul Graham’s Latest Essay – MIT Launches Initiatives in Innovation and India

  • Bogle on the Retirement Crisis

    John Bogle was the founder of Vanguard Group and a well respected investment mind. He has written several good books including: The Little Book of Common Sense Investing, Common Sense on Mutual Funds and Bogle on Mutual Funds. This interview from 2006 discusses the state of the retirement system, before the credit crisis.

    John Bogle: The whole retirement system, in fact, in the country is in, I think, very poor shape, and it’s going to be the next big financial crisis in the country, I honestly believe. … The private pension plans are underfunded by an estimated $400 billion, and the state and local government plans are underfunded by an estimated $800 billion. That’s a $1.2 trillion shortfall between the assets the plans have and the liabilities they will have to the pensioners as they pay out their retirement checks over the rest of their lifetimes.

    Frontline: How do they get away with that? Don’t they have to fund them?

    John Bogle: No, they don’t, because a lot of it is based on assumptions. Our corporations are now assuming that future returns in their pension plan will be about 8.5 percent per year, and that’s not going to happen. The future returns in the bond market will be about 4.5 percent, and maybe if we’re lucky 7.5 percent on stocks. Call it a 6 percent return — before you deduct the cost of investing all that money, the turnover cost, the management fees. So maybe a 5 percent return is going to be possible, in my judgment, and they are estimating 8.5 percent.

    Why? Because when they do it that way, corporation earnings become greatly overstated, and all the executives get nice, big bonuses. They are using pension plan assumptions as a way to manage corporate earnings and meet the expectations of Wall Street.

    Frontline: So if a company overstates the value of its pension plan assets, it makes the company look better to Wall Street, so there’s an incentive to kind of exaggerate, if not cheat.

    John Bogle: That is precisely correct. And let me clear on the cheating: It’s legal cheating; it’s not illegal cheating. In other words, you can change any reasonable set of numbers — and corporations have done this, have raised the pension assumption from 7 percent to 8.5 percent — and all of a sudden that corporation will report an earnings gain for the year rather than an earnings loss that they would otherwise have. Simple, legal.

    The entire PBS series (from 2006) on 401(k)s (including interviews with Elizabeth Warren, David Wray and Alicia Munnell) is worth reading.

    In February of 2009 he spoke to the House of Representatives committee exploring retirement security.
    (more…)