Tag: China

  • Why the Dollar is Falling

    Why the dollar is falling

    On Tuesday October 20th, for example, the dollar index had slipped to 75.24, its lowest point in more than a year.

    This hardly constitutes an outright collapse, nor is it necessarily cause for concern. American exporters, whose goods have become more competitive abroad, are happy with their weaker currency. Similarly domestic producers may be cheered that rival, imported goods are more expensive. And European tourists, who can buy more for their euros during weekend shopping excursions to America, may cheer too. However, the continued decline of the dollar does come against a backdrop of ominous murmurs from the likes of China and Russia, who hold much of their reserves in dollars, about the need to shift their reserves out of the greenback. Brazil’s imposition of a 2% levy on portfolio inflows is also a sign that other countries are getting nervous about seeing their currencies rise against the dollar.

    But it is hard, also, to think of a parallel in history. A country heavily in debt to foreigners, with a government deficit it is making little headway at controlling, is creating vast amounts of additional currency. Yet it is allowed to get away with very low interest rates. Eventually such an arrangement must surely break down, bringing a new currency system into being, just as Bretton Woods emerged in the 1940s.

    The absence of a credible alternative to the dollar means that, despite its declining value, its status as the world’s reserve currency is not seriously under threat. But the system could change in other ways. A world where currencies traded within bands, or where foreign creditors insist on America issuing some debt in other currencies, are all real possibilities as the world adjusts to a declining dollar.

    The issuance of USA government debt of any significant size in other currencies would be an amazing event, to me. However, that does not mean it won’t happen. In my opinion it is hard to justify the non-collapse of the dollar, and has been for quite some time.

    The huge future tax liability imposed over the last few decades along with the failure to save by those in the country creates a hollow economy. Granted the USA had a huge surplus of wealth built up since the end of World War II. The USA has to a great extent sold off that wealth to finance living beyond the productive capacity of the country the last 20-30 years. But that can only go on so long.

    The only thing saving the dollar is that other countries do not want the dollar to decline because they don’t want the competition of American goods (either being sold to their country or for the goods they hope to export). So they intervene to stop the fall of the dollar (and buy USA government debt). That can serve to artificially inflate the dollar for some time. However, eventually I think that will collapse. And when it does it will likely be very quick. The idea of the USA issuing debt in other currencies seems crazy now. It could then go from possibility to necessity within months.

    You cannot print money forever to live beyond your means and have people accept it as valuable. The government can runs deficits if the citizen’s finance that debt with savings: and still maintain a sound currency. But the recent period, given the macro-economic conditions, don’t justify the value of the dollar. It should have fallen much further a long time ago. The other saving grace for the dollar is few large economies have untarnished economies. The Euro has strengths but is hardly perfect. The Chinese Renminbi is possibly the strongest contender but the economy is still very controlled, financial data is untrustworthy, political freedom is not sufficient… The Japanese Yen does have some strengths but really their long term macro-economic conditions is far from sound.

    In the current economic environment investing in currencies is one way to look for higher returns and even to diversify and hedge your portfolio using forex trading strategies.

    Related: The USA Economy Needs to Reduce Personal and Government DebtLet the Good Times Roll (using Credit)Federal Reserve to Buy $1.2T in Bonds, Mortgage-Backed SecuritiesWho Will Buy All the USA’s Debt?

  • Data on the Largest Manufacturing Countries in 2008

    Manufacturing is an powerful driver of economic wealth. For years I have been providing data to counter the contention that the manufacturing base of the USA is gone and the little bit left was shrinking. The latest data again shows the USA is the largest manufacturer, and manufacturing in the USA continues to grow. It is true global manufacturing has begun to grow more rapidly than USA manufacturing in the last few years. I doubt many suspect that the USA’s share of manufacturing stayed stable from 1990 to 1995 then grew to 2000 took until 2006 to return to the 1990-1995 levels and then has declined in 2007 and 2008 a bit below the 1990 level and during that entire time was growing (even in 2007 and 2008).

    The USA’s share of the manufacturing output, of the countries that manufactured over $185 billion in 2008, 28% in 1990, 28% in 1995, 32% in 2000, 28% in 2005, 28% in 2006, 26% in 2007 and 24% in 2008. China’s share has grown from 4% in 1990, 6% in 1995, 10% in 2000, 13% in 2005, 14% in 2006, 16% in 2007 to 18% in 2008. Japan’s share has fallen from 22% in 1990 to 14% in 2008 (after increasing to 26% in 1995 then steadily falling). The USA has about 4.5% of the world population, China about 20%.

    Based on the latest UN Data, for global manufacturing, in billions of current US dollars:

    Country 1990 1995 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008
    USA 1,041 1,289 1,543 1,624 1,712 1,756 1,831
    China 145 300 484 734* 891* 1,106* 1,399**
    Japan 810 1,219 1,034 979 927 923 1,045
    Germany 438 517 392 571 608 711 767
    Italy 240 226 206 295 302 345 381
    United Kingdom 206 218 226 264 295 323 323
    France 200 233 190 255 255 287 306
    Russian Federation 120 64 45 124 157 206 256
    Brazil 120 125 96 137 163 201 237
    Korea 66 131 136 211 234 260 231
    Spain 112 104 98 160 170 196 222
    Mexico 62 67 133 154 175 182 197
    Canada 92 100 129 168 182 197 195
    India 51 61 69 122 141 177 188

    * I am using the data from last year that separated the manufacturing data (this year the data does not provide separate manufacturing data for China) instead of that shown in the most recent data (which doesn’t separate manufacturing)
    ** The China data is not provided for manufacturing alone. The percentage of manufacturing (to manufacturing, mining and utilities) was 78% for 2005-2007 (I used 78% of the manufacturing, mining and utilities figure provided in the 2008 data).

    I hope to write a series of posts examining global manufacturing data including looking at manufacturing data specifically (excluding mining and utility data).
    (more…)

  • Why China’s Economic Data is Questionable

    There are several issues with economic data, as I have mentioned before. These issues have to be considered when analyzing economic data and being financially literate requires an understanding of the problems with economic data. The political pressures for manipulating the data to appear good exist is every country. The practical difference is the other forces that push for data that is more accurate (businesses, investors, economists… need accurate data to succeed) and practices that have been adopted to provide accurate data.

    Foreign Policy magazine takes a look at problems in How China Cooks Its Books

    Pressure to distort or fudge statistics likely comes from up high — and it’s intense. “China announces its annual objective of GDP growth rate each year. In Chinese culture, the government has to reach the objective; otherwise, they will ‘lose face,’” said Gary Liu, deputy director of the China Europe International Business School’s Lujiazui International Financial Research Center. “For instance, the government announced that it wanted to ensure a GDP growth rate of 8 percent in 2009, and it has become the priority for government officials to meet that objective.”

    But local and provincial governmental officials are the ones who actually fiddle with the numbers. They retain considerable autonomy and power, and have a self-interested reason to manipulate economic statistics. When they reach or exceed the central government’s economic goals, they get rewarded with better jobs or more money. “The higher [their] GDP [figures], the higher the chance will be for local officials to get promoted,” explained Liu.

    Last October, Vice Premier Li Keqiang said in a speech after inspecting China’s Statistics Bureau, “China’s foundation for statistics is still very weak, and the quality of statistics is to be further improved” — a brutally harsh assessment coming from a top state official.

    China’s economy grew at an annualized 6.1 percent rate in the first quarter, and 7.9 percent in the second. Yet electricity usage, a key indicator in industrial growth and a harder metric to manipulate, declined 2.2 percent in the first six months of the year. How could an economy largely dependent on manufacturing grow while its industrial sector shrank? It couldn’t; the numbers don’t add up

    My guess is China’s data is highly questionable and still China’s economy is fairly strong. But because the data is so questionable it does make the risks of being wrong on that guess fairly high. Even the US government data is flawed: it is no surprise China’s data is less reliable.

    Related: Is China’s Recovery for Real?Misuse of Statistics – Mania in Financial MarketsManufacturing Employment Data – 1979 to 2007The Long-Term USA Federal Budget Outlook
    Data Shows Subprime Mortgages Were Failing Years Before the Crisis Hit

  • China May Take Car Sales Lead from USA in 2009

    China’s economy continues to grow quickly. It looks as though that, along with the slump in US car sales, likely will lead to China taking the world sales lead for cars (I would imagine for the first time ever the USA has not held this title). China 2009 Vehicle Sales May Rise 28% on Stimulus:

    Full-year sales may reach as high as 12 million vehicles, Chen Bin, chief director of the industry coordination department at the National Development and Reform Commission, said today at a conference in Tianjin. U.S. sales will likely be around 10.5 million, according to both General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co.

    China has boosted auto sales this year through tax cuts and subsidies as a part of a wider 4 trillion yuan ($586 billion) stimulus that has shielded the country from the worst of the global recession. U.S. sales have slumped 28 percent, pushing the old GM and Chrysler LLC into bankruptcy. Last year’s total was 13.2 million, compared with 9.4 million in China.

    Partially due to the strong internal Chinese demand (and partially due to Chinese regulation) India actually exports more cars than China. 5 times as many cars are purchased in China as are bought in India.

    Indian Car Exports Beat China’s

    [In India] Total exports, including vans, sport-utility vehicles and trucks, rose 18 percent to 229,809.

    In contrast, China’s exports slumped 60 percent to 164,800 between January and July, according to government data. Vehicles produced in Thailand for export declined 43 percent to 263,768, according to the Thai Automotive Club.

    South Korean exports dropped 31 percent to 1.12 million units, according to the Korea Automobile Manufacturers Association. Japan, the world’s largest automobile producer and exporter, shipped 1.77 million cars, trucks and buses.

    Related: The Relative Economic Position of the USA is Likely to DeclineManufacturing Cars in the USARodgers on the US and Chinese Economies

  • Oil Consumption by Country in 2007

    The largest oil consuming countries (and EU), in millions of barrels per day for 2007. China increased use by 1 billion barrels a day, the USA and Europe decreased use by 100 million barrels a day from our post last year on Oil Consumption by Country.

    Country consumption % of oil used % of population % of World GDP % of oil used in 2006
    USA 20.7 24.3 4.5 21.0 25.9
    European Union 14.4 16.9 7.4 21.9 18.1
    China 7.9 9.2 19.9 10.8 8.6
    Japan 5.0 5.8 1.8 6.5 6.7
    India 2.7 3.1 17.3 4.5 3.0
    Russia 2.7 3.1 2.0 3.1 3.6
    Germany 2.5 2.8 1.2 4.2 3.3
    Brazil 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.6
    Canada 2.4 2.7 0.4 1.9 2.9
    Mexico 2.1 2.4 1.6 2.0 2.6
    South Korea 2.1 2.4 0.7 1.8 2.7

    Data is from CIA World Factbook 2009 (downloaded August 2009). GDP calculated using purchasing power parity from 2008 fact book with estimated 2007 data.

    Related: Government Debt as a Percentage of GDPGlobal Manufacturing Production by CountryManufacturing Contracting Globally (March 2009)

  • Is China’s Recovery for Real?

    China’s recovery: Is it for real?

    according to John Makin of the American Enterprise Institute, the country’s official economic figures — we’re talking the Chinese government’s numbers here and not those reported by individual companies — systematically overstate the speed of the country’s economic recovery.

    Investors don’t need to answer or even be interested in those philosophical questions. But they do need to consider the possibility that China’s huge acceleration in its growth rate is merely an artifact of the way the country keeps its books.

    Economic data is often messy and confusing. The data itself often has measurement error. The actual aim is often not exactly what people think. And the data is often delayed so it provides a view of the situation, not today, but in the past and guesses must be made about what that says about today and the future.

    And on top of those factors many countries feel significant internal pressures to report numbers that make the current economy look good. This is just another factor investor must consider when looking to make investments and evaluate economic conditions.

    It seems to me the Chinese recovery does look real. How strong the economy will be 6 months from now is less clear but right now things look positive to me.

    Related: posts on economic dataWhat Do Unemployment Stats Mean?China Manufacturing Expands for the Fourth Straight Month (Jun 2009)A Bull on China

  • China Manufacturing Expands for the Fourth Straight Month

    China Manufacturing Expands a Fourth Month

    China’s manufacturing expanded for a fourth month as government stimulus spending and record bank lending sparked a recovery in the world’s third-biggest economy.

    China’s economy may keep improving in the third and fourth quarters, enabling the nation to meet its 8 percent economic growth target for this year, central bank Governor Zhou Xiaochuan said this week.

    Given the still quite uncertain global economy this is a pretty strong performance. And it is one of the positive indications that we may be recovering from the credit crisis. There continues to be fairly good news in many areas. However we are far from certain to make a decently global recovery even in 2010.

    Related: Manufacturing Contracting GloballyRodgers on the US and Chinese EconomiesManufacturing Cars in the USALeading Manufacturing Countries in 2007USA Unemployment Rate Jumps to 9.4%The Economy is in Serious Trouble

  • The Relative Economic Position of the USA is Likely to Decline

    The economic clout of the USA has been huge since the end of World War II. The relative position has been decreasing recently with the rise of not only Europe and Japan but Korea, China, India, Brazil and many more. This means the risks to the USA of failing to deal with perennial problems (the most costly but not most effective health care system, spending beyond our means, weak diplomacy, excessive legal costs, poor management practices…) is higher today than it has been.

    Fareed Zakaria’s Post American World is a good explanation of some of the current global economic forces in play. He comes to the same conclusion I do that the USA is still in the strongest position today. But the world is changing and the relative position of the United States is declining. The new world requires working with others and the USA needs to adjust to this reality. Too many think the USA can continue to act as though the rest of the world must comply with the wishes of the USA.

    Foreign students and immigrants account for 50 percent of the science researchers in the country and, in 2006, received 40 percent of the doctorates in science and engineering and 65 percent fo the doctorates in computer science. by 2010, foreign students will get more than 50 percent of all Ph.D’s awarded in every subject in the United States. I n the sciences, that figure will be closer to 75 percent. Half of all Silicon Valley start-ups have one founder who is an immigrant or first-generation American.

    The litigation system is now routinely referred to as a huge cost of doing business, but no one dares propose any reform of it. Our mortgage deduction for housing costs a staggering $80 billion a year, and we are told it is crucial to support home ownership. Except that Margaret Thatcher eliminated it in Britain, and yet that country has the same rate of home ownership as the United States. We rarely look around and notice other options and alternatives, convinced that “we’re number one.”

    America has become a nation consumed by anxiety, worried about terrorist and rouge nations, Muslims and Mexicans, foreign companies and free trade, immigrants and international organizations. The strongest nation in the history of the world now sees itself as besieged by forces beyond its control.

    The book focuses quite a bit on the USA, China and India and provides good overviews of the economic strength and weaknesses of those countries. The USA is in a leadership position but the future requires an understanding that others deserve to be treated as partners not allies to be dictated to. If not they will just partially disengage with the USA and create stronger relationships with others. That would not be in the interests of the USA.

    Related: Best Research University Rankings (2008)Dr. Deming’s 7 Deadly Diseases of Western ManagementScience leadership and economic growthEasiest Countries for Doing Business (2008)Top 12 Manufacturing Countries in 2007Why America Needs an Economic StrategyCountry H-index Rank for Science PublicationsUSA Spent $2.2 Trillion, 16.2% of GDP, on Health Care in 2007

  • Growing Crude Storage in China

    Growing Crude Storage in China

    “Our analysis confirms that tanker capacity arrivals into China have spiked up in recent months, in line with imports, but more importantly, tanker arrivals into Strategic Petroleum Reserve ports have increased materially,” Bernstein says

    Bernstein estimates that the amount of crude entering the SPR ports in China—the world’s second biggest oil consumer after the U.S.–has increased by around 400,000 barrels a day since November, based on its assessment using the satellite imaging services of Google, the search engine company.

    There’s likely more to come. Bernstein says satellite images show a marked increase in oil-storage construction over the past few years and estimates that China’s number of days of forward demand–a gauge of oil storage–amount to just 28 days of imports and 14 days of total demand.

    China is targeting storage capacity that will hold demand cover of around 90 days. (The U.S. currently has storage for about 62 days of oil imports.) In other words, there’s a lot more oil still to be packed away in China now and in the coming years as more facilities are built.

    This is another smart move by China, in my opinion. With the huge amount of cash they are holding, I would rather hold more of it as crude than dollars. And stockpiling the crude also protects the domestic demand from supply shocks. I would also take other steps they are taking, like investing heavily in adding wind power capacity.

    Related: I Wouldn’t Sell Oil at These PricesWho Will Buy All the USA’s Debt?Oil Consumption by CountrySouth Korea To Invest $22 Billion in Overseas Energy Projects

  • China A-Share Premium

    World-Beating China Rally Doomed by PetroChina’s Hong Kong Gap

    Shares in the yuan-denominated CSI 300 Index traded at 16.2 times earnings this month, compared with 8.6 times for 43 mainland companies in Hong Kong. PetroChina Co., the country’s biggest company, fetches twice the valuation in China as in Hong Kong.

    Restrictions on foreign and local investment that prevent arbitrage with H shares helped make mainland equities more expensive.

    It is pretty odd that there is such a large premium that local Chinese investors must pay to own stocks in the same companies available to foreign investors. There has been a discount on the Hong Kong shares (H-shares), of maybe 20-30%, for years. But it seems that either the H-shares are cheap or the Chinese shares are too expensive (or maybe a little of both). I am positive on the outlook for China both in the short and long term. Though investments there do have substantial risks (as they do anywhere). I would imagine this premium for Chinese (A-shares) should also largely disappear over the next decade as the market is allowed to become one (and at least allow arbitrage between to the two markets to reduce the premium).

    Related: Capitalism in ChinaEasiest Countries for Doing Business 2008China and USA Exports and Imports Drop Sharply